For the Hell of It – part 2

Review of Love Wins, part 1 of 2

Rob Bell begins Love Wins by reciting the litany of questions that have haunted Christian apologists throughout the ages. They’re real questions, hard questions, legitimate questions. What is Salvation? Who is saved? How is one saved? What about evil done in the name of Christ? Bell rightfully says that “Some Jesuses should be rejected” (p. 9). I wholeheartedly agree.

 

The God in whose name the Crusades were carried out? Not my Jesus.

The God who condoned the Inquisition? Not my Jesus.

The God of the health and wealth gospel? Not my Jesus.

The God of pedophile Catholic priests? Not my Jesus.

The God of the Christian religion (note this term)? Not my Jesus.

The list goes on.

 

Man’s perception of God, and more specifically a professed Christian’s view of Jesus, might not actually reflect the attitude and actions of the Almighty. Man’s perceptions of God does not make God, instead man ends up serving a god in his own image and likeness. Bell points this out poignantly and it serves as his basis for the rest of the book. Are our classic evangelical perceptions of God, Jesus, heaven, hell, and salvation actually rooted in reality? Beginning with heaven, Bell tries to answer these questions.

 

I say tries, but truth be told, Bell’s narrative is more a rhetorical dance around the issue, concluding in some sort of hipster, postmodern, intellectual skepticism. The points Bell makes are good, but he struggles to actually hit the issue with the issue. In the chapter “Here is the New There,” Bell rightly points out the responsibilities of the Christian to live in the Kingdom now.

 

Christians have a longing for eternity and evangelicals especially couch their whole come-to-Jesus spiel around the everlasting afterlife called heaven. While God has “set eternity in the hearts of men” (Ecc. 3:11), he was also very very insistent on the things we should do in this life. One doesn’t become a Christian then merely hang out and wait until one dies for the party to start. Rather, the Kingdom of God is within us…now…alive…mortal.

 

Bell draws out this theme but misses two key points in this chapter. First, he plays a bait and switch with the stereotype. He’s purporting to talk about Heaven, but in reality he’s talking about sanctification in the life of the believer. Second, he never corrects the stereotype of heaven as an ethereal—well, heavenly—place. In truth, what we consider heaven, where believers will spend eternity, actually is on the physical plane. Read Revelation. New heavens and new earth (Rev. 21:1, 1 Cor 15:35-58). Because Bell doesn’t point this out and focuses on sanctification over glorification, his valid point loses some of its luster. Yeah, what Bell talks about…that’s the start. But it’s really only the beginning.

 

 

It’s really the same exact mistake for Hell—immediacies are taken as ultimacies. The shadow is perceived as the real thing. This is really the crux of the book because it’s Bell’s exegesis on passages on Hell and his word studies on aion and olam that brought forth the resounding cry of “Universalist!” Bell’s conclusion is that the brokenness of this world is a hell unto itself. Personally, I think Bell’s exegesis here is not at all unfounded but is indeed lacking much substance. We’ll return to consider this, at least regarding aion, later. And we’ll leave the second half of Love Wins for tomorrow’s discussion.

 

To conclude, Bell does Christianity a service by pointing out that the kingdom of God is within us (Luke 17:21), that we as believers have been brought from death to life (Romans 6:13), and that it is our job to tackle the brokenness of this world and this life as Christ’s ambassadors (2 Cor. 5:20). But you’ll note that none of this has anything to do with the ultimate destiny of man and that’s really the problem. Bell isn’t really talking what he claims to be talking about.

 

What do you think? Does Bell miss the point? Join in the conversation below.

Comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Author: Josh Olds

Share This Post On

1 Comment

  1. In his new book “Love Wins” Rob Bell seems to say that loving and compassionate people, regardless of their faith, will not be condemned to eternal hell just because they do not accept Jesus Christ as their Savior.

    Concepts of an afterlife vary between religions and among divisions of each faith. Here are three quotes from “the greatest achievement in life,” my free ebook on comparative mysticism:

    (46) Few people have been so good that they have earned eternal paradise; fewer want to go to a place where they must receive punishments for their sins. Those who do believe in resurrection of their body hope that it will be not be in its final form. Few people really want to continue to be born again and live more human lives; fewer want to be reborn in a non-human form. If you are not quite certain you want to seek divine union, consider the alternatives.

    (59) True mystics transcend apparent manifestations of the theatrical production called “this life.” Theirs is not simply a search for meaning, but discovery of what is, i.e. the Real underlying the seeming realities. Their objective is not heaven, gardens, paradise, or other celestial places. It is not being where the divine lives, but to be what the divine essence is here and now.

    (80) [referring to many non-mystics] Depending on their religious convictions, or personal beliefs, they may be born again to seek elusive perfection, go to a purgatory to work out their sins or, perhaps, pass on into oblivion. Lives are different; why not afterlives? Beliefs might become true.

    Rob Bell asks us to reexamine the Christian Gospel. People of all faiths should look beyond the letter of their sacred scriptures to their spiritual message. As one of my mentors wrote “In God we all meet.”

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *